2025年2月5 日，新加坡教育部長陳振聲在國會書面答覆盛港集選區議員林志蔚副教授有關降低附屬小學學生進入中學的分數線問題。 以下內容為新加坡眼根據國會英文資料翻譯整理：

18. 林志蔚副教授（盛港集選區議員）詢問教育部長：

(a) 附屬中學調低對口小學畢業生入學分數線的政策依據是什麼？

(b) 教育部是否監管各校具體降分幅度？

(c) 附屬中學如何確保優待入學學生學業表現不落後於普通生？

陳振聲（教育部長）： 我國教育體系旨在激發學習熱忱、發掘潛能並培養社會公民。為此我們構建了多元化升學通道，附屬學校以其歷史傳承與獨特文化成為重要組成部分。

在實現這一平衡過程中，我們認識到在政策上需考量三大維度：

首先，我們希望根據學生的個人特長和興趣對他們進行合理分班。現在，包括附屬學校在內的整個中學系統都實行全面科目編班制（Full-Subject Based Banding），能比以前更精準地匹配學生專長。

其次，我們認識到附屬學校在教育方面的一些優點。例如，附屬學校政策為具有悠久歷史和獨特文化的學校提供了機會，使其能夠在較長時期內始終如一地向學生灌輸學校的價值觀、校風和文化。

第三，我們要確保我們的社會保持開放和凝聚力，而不是封閉和分裂。這要從我們的學校做起。儘管我們支持學校文化、價值觀和傳統的建設，但這絕不能以犧牲社會凝聚力和我們作為一個國家的主張為代價。

這就是為什麼隨著我們的社會逐漸成熟，面臨著更大的分層風險，我們的教育體系也在不斷發展。其中一個例子是，教育部（MOE）要求附屬中學從 2019 年中一派位工作開始，為非附屬學生保留 20% 的學額，而以前是沒有的。在教育部的鼓勵下，一些附屬學校還收緊了附屬學校必須達到的 「附屬學校最低要求」，以便非附屬學校的學生有更多機會優先入學。

自 2021 年中一派位以來，每年都有約半數來自非對口小學。其餘一半則來自所屬的附屬小學。附屬小學與非附屬小學的截分差異，視派位組別而定。三類派位組別（Posting Group）分數線差異如下：

第三組別：附屬生與非附屬生平均差7分

第二組別：平均差2分

第一組別：平均差1分

雖然這可能是我們目前所確定的平衡點，但隨著時間的推移和情況的變化，我們將繼續調整和進一步完善，以便在今後取得適當的平衡。

以下是英文質詢內容：

18 Assoc Prof Jamus Jerome Lim asked the Minister for Education (a) what is the rationale for secondary schools with affiliated primary schools to receive reductions in Secondary 1 entry scores; (b) whether the Ministry exercises oversight over the magnitude of the reductions in entry scores applied by each school; and (c) how effective have these secondary schools been in ensuring that the high-scoring students do not fall behind relative to their peers that entered with lower scores.

Mr Chan Chun Sing: In Singapore, our goals in education are to spark the joy of learning in students, help them realise their potential and build the foundations for them to be active, contributing members of society. This is why we have a variegated education landscape that offers our students a range of school options catering to their diverse interests, needs and strengths. Affiliated schools contribute to one part of this landscape, with their long history and distinctive school culture.

In achieving this balance, we acknowledge that there are competing policy tensions.

First, we want to right-site our students based on their individual strengths and interests. Now, with Full-Subject Based Banding across our secondary school system, including affiliated schools, we are better able to achieve this today than before.

Second, we recognise that there are some educational merits to school affiliation. For example, the affiliation policy provides schools with a long history and distinctive culture with the opportunity to consistently imbue their school values, ethos and culture into their students over a longer period.

未完待续,请点击[下一页]继续阅读

Third, we want to ensure that our society remains open and cohesive; not closed and fractured. This starts in our schools. Even as we support the building of school culture, values and tradition, this must not come at the expense of social cohesion and what we stand for as a nation.

This is why we have evolved our education system over time, as our society matures and faces greater risk of becoming more stratified. One example was when the Ministry of Education (MOE) required affiliated secondary schools to reserve 20% of places for non-affiliated students, when there was none before, from the 2019 Secondary 1 Posting Exercise. With MOE's encouragement, some affiliated schools have also tightened the Affiliate Minimum Requirements that affiliates must meet to be eligible for priority to the school, facilitating greater access for non-affiliated students.

For each year since the 2021 Secondary 1 Posting Exercise, about half of the Secondary 1 cohort of the affiliated secondary schools are from non-affiliated primary schools, with the remaining half from their respective affiliated primary schools. The difference in cut-off points between affiliates and non-affiliates varies depending on the Posting Group. For Posting Group 3, the average difference is about seven points. For Posting Groups 2 and 1, the average difference is smaller, at two and one point respectively, as the ranges of cut-off points in these posting groups are narrower than for Posting Group 3. The median mirrors the average for all three Posting Groups.

While this may be the current balance that we have established for now, we will continue to adjust and make further refinements, as time goes by and circumstances change, so that we can achieve the right balance for the future.

CF丨翻譯

Alex丨編審

新加坡國會丨來源

新加坡國會丨圖源

免責聲明：